Search found 145 matches

Return to advanced search

Re: LiDAR for Jocassee Gorges State Park

Michael,

Could you also do the SC section of the jocassee gorges?

Lat 35.05 Lon -82.848

Tyler
by Tyler
Wed Dec 20, 2017 10:00 am
 
Forum: North Carolina
Topic: LiDAR for Jocassee Gorges State Park
Comments: 5
Views: 201

Re: Congaree Search Request#3

Michael, The first image with the 167.3' tree is likely the pine that was tape dropped in Feb 2009. Measurement was 168.7'. I think there was another pine NE that was similar in height. The fourth image with the 161' tree looks to be a pine that died in 2012 but was measured to around 160'. Would ha...
by Tyler
Thu Dec 14, 2017 11:28 pm
 
Forum: South Carolina
Topic: Congaree Search Request#3
Comments: 2
Views: 85

Re: Congaree LiDAR search request#2

Michael, That looks awesome! The second tile from the top is where I measured many baldcypress trees to over 140' with the tallest at 148'. Because of the flat ground would the tallest trees in each tile be 1-2' taller than the lidar estimate as in the first search? If it's not too much trouble coul...
by Tyler
Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:17 am
 
Forum: South Carolina
Topic: Congaree LiDAR search request#2
Comments: 2
Views: 108

Re: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA

Michael,

Thanks for those.

These two have some of the tallest pines in the park. Just curious as to how the lidar looks on these two tiles.

Lat 33 49' 42''N Lon 080 48' 48''W

Lat 33 49' 13''N Lon 080 48' 50''W

Thanks,

Tyler
by Tyler
Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:12 am
 
Forum: Measurement and Dendromorphometry
Topic: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA
Comments: 41
Views: 936

Re: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA

Michael, Could you look at some individual tiles from Congaree NP for me? The coordinates associated with them are: 33 47' 11''N 080 47' 39''W Should have a tall grove of trees >140' toward the bottom of the tile 33 48' 13''N 080 49' 36''W Part of Boggy Gut, a known big/tall tree hotspot 33 48' 03&q...
by Tyler
Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:14 am
 
Forum: Measurement and Dendromorphometry
Topic: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA
Comments: 41
Views: 936

Re: Congaree NP LiDAR search - tallest 161-163 feet

Michael, Wow!! I didn't expect such tall trees close to the river. Comparing the lidar image with my John Cely Congaree map shows that the tallest hit is likely in an even age grove of sweetgum. The all time sweetgum record (157') also grows in an even age grove a few miles upriver and inland of the...
by Tyler
Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:19 am
 
Forum: South Carolina
Topic: Congaree NP LiDAR search - tallest 161-163 feet
Comments: 1
Views: 89

Re: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA

Michael,

It's inside of the jocassee gorges area.

overview13.gif
overview13.gif (15.9 KiB) Viewed 154 times


Hope this helps. Looking forward to the results.

Tyler
by Tyler
Tue Dec 05, 2017 9:28 pm
 
Forum: Measurement and Dendromorphometry
Topic: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA
Comments: 41
Views: 936

Re: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA

Michael,

I would be interested in any South Carolina data for Congaree National Park especially areas that are 140'+. Also if there are any 180'+ trees in Laurel Fork Heritage Preserve and surrounding areas.

Thanks,

Tyler
by Tyler
Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:54 am
 
Forum: Measurement and Dendromorphometry
Topic: LiDAR Coverage for the Eastern USA
Comments: 41
Views: 936

Re: Quercus laurifolia - maximum known age?

addy, Just before Congaree was protected in the mid 1970s conservationist counted 115 rings on a 3' 6" diameter stump in one of the cutover areas. Recently Thomas Doyle cored a swamp laurel oak in the early to mid 2000s and got 129 rings. I'm sure there are older trees there. Don, Hurricane Mat...
by Tyler
Sat Jul 22, 2017 11:22 am
 
Forum: Dendrochronology and Tree Ages
Topic: Quercus laurifolia - maximum known age?
Comments: 2
Views: 208

Re: Link to Virginia Tech Dendrology Lab

Bob,

I'll gladly share my data. I agree with the format being used.

Tyler
by Tyler
Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:52 am
 
Forum: Links to Other Tree Groups
Topic: Link to Virginia Tech Dendrology Lab
Comments: 72
Views: 3388
Next

Return to advanced search